Also came here to say Doom. But can it (a potato) run Doom? Even if not, someone almost certainly will have tried and partially succeeded.
Comment on Name it
LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Doom
Avicenna@programming.dev 1 week ago
Comment on Name it
LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Doom
Also came here to say Doom. But can it (a potato) run Doom? Even if not, someone almost certainly will have tried and partially succeeded.
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 1 week ago
Even 2016 and Eternal have pretty moderate requirements for their fidelity.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 week ago
Arguably, 2016 and Eternal prove it much better than the original - people nowadays are way too spoilt to really appreciate those early 3D graphics, and IMO early 3D graphics aged much worse than pixel art.
sploosh@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I don’t think anyone disagrees about early 3d aging poorly. But I wouldn’t even call OG Doom fully 3d on account of everything besides walls and floors being sprites. Sprites are just pixels, and no vertices mean no 3d.