My town requires a certain amount of onstreet parking be alotted based on number of houses on a road. Iirc it works out to about one car length per 3 houses. I live on a narrow one way road, (parking only on the right hand side, but houses on both sides- the road is too narrow so a driveway on the left becomes inaccessible with a car parked across it on the right) that has now hit its maximum on non parking areas, which has started to have an interesting effect; one house was demoed and rebuilt with a garage included. They were not allowed to have the driveway open onto our road, as that would necessitate a yellow line in front of it, and ended up having to spend ~$1M to buy access rights to connect through the neighbor on the other side’s property.
There are currently 2 lots that could in theory be subdivided with new houses on them, that currently cannot be approved for building, because adding even one house would create the need for one new, impossible to eke out, on-street spot (even if they had a driveway, its about required parking for home service industries, guests, etc)
CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 5 hours ago
Or they could build and maintain a functional public transit network that allows people to get around without cars.
I see your point, but I think it’s a patch on a broken system - even as someone who primarily uses a car for transportation.
Personally, I think this person should be towed immediately. No excuse.
osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 5 hours ago
If it's there that consistently, it might live there (is that a school over on the left?). But even schools that don't regularly collect students with dedicated school busses busses might want to have some for taking groups places, either transporting them between buildings in the district or for field trips or similar.