I always hate when this argument is used when were talking about celebrities here. As if a famous athlete or a famous musicians relation to labour and the benefits of that labour is at all comparable to say a coal miner’s relationship with capital.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Complaining about athletes just makes it sound petty. Athletes are just employees, if you’re going to complain, complain about the athletes’ and nurses’ employers. Rich people never gave a flying fuck about their employees, and underfunded schools are a feature for them, too.
Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 weeks ago
rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Professions that have a high pay cealing do have a different relationship to capital than miners, nurses etc., but most athletes and musicians still aren’t millionaires. It just feels like a waste of effort to complain about a celebrity who owns tens of millions, when the core issue is the people who own hundreds and thousands of millions. Crab bucket mentality IMO.
Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 weeks ago
We aren’t talking about those athletes. Nobody thinks that professional athletes that don’t make any money are overpaid.
DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Baseball players went on strike in 1972. They’d had a ‘union’ since the 1800s, but always bowed to the owners.
forrgott@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Complaining about athletes just makes it sound petty.
And your opening statement makes your entire post sound completely out of touch.
Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 2 weeks ago
And the overwhelming majority of athletes do not earn well. It’s only the top 1% that gets rich, and only those in sports with a lot of public appeal.