Is this supposed to be a negative?
Comment on Anon is a fan of GabeN
truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 1 day ago
BTW the way refunds work is that steam withholds the money for a month to pay refunds with it. The publisher has no say, they just get gross - 30% - VAT - refunds.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Well the op said it was out of their own pockets, this is saying that op’s claim is fake.
The fact that you immediately got weirdly defensive about it tells me you think it’s a negative.
ScoopMcPoops@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
“You immediately got weirdly defensive”, and the dude asked a single question.
“Your cute little indie game”, bro why do you talk like a Disney bully?
uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 5 hours ago
It was a very weirdly defensive question.
And your little dog too
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 hours ago
How was I being “weirdly defensive”?
uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 1 hour ago
Tone in text is an exercise for the reader if it wasn’t an exercise for the author.
GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 day ago
Also giving refunds is required by law in some countries, it’s not like valve invented it out of the goodness of their heart.
JesusChristLover420@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
Australia sued them into their current refund policy
drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
They did not need to extend that to countries like the US.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 hours ago
At a certain point, making some functionality only available to part of your audience is more costly than just allowing it for everyone. Also the PR would have been horrible.
Now, being sued into doing it at all somehow made everyone in this thread fawn over them…