So don’t accept code that is shit. Have decent PR process. Accountability is still on human.
If this is necessary then there is, in point of fact, a “problem with keeping code quality when using AI”.
So don’t accept code that is shit. Have decent PR process. Accountability is still on human.
So don’t accept code that is shit. Have decent PR process. Accountability is still on human.
If this is necessary then there is, in point of fact, a “problem with keeping code quality when using AI”.
A decent review process is always necessary, LLMs or not.
OK, sure, but again the claim was:
there is no problem in keeping code quality while using AI
Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
This is necessary when working with 100% human code too.
OK, sure, but again the claim was:
there is no problem in keeping code quality while using AI
Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
The people lazy enough to have ai generate their code aren’t going to do that.