Because engraving the symbols is just too expensive.
Comment on Chaotic Evil
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 22 hours ago
It’s to differentiate 2.0 from 3.0
ulterno@programming.dev 5 hours ago
Comment on Chaotic Evil
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 22 hours ago
It’s to differentiate 2.0 from 3.0
Because engraving the symbols is just too expensive.
Valmond@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
3.0, 3.2 or 3.2 2x2 ?
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 19 hours ago
3.2 gen 2 pro max sonic & knuckles edition.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 19 hours ago
3.2 2x2 Episode 2.
marcos@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
3.0 and 2.0 are the same, aren’t they?
Natanael@infosec.pub 19 hours ago
3.0 and 2.0 are very different. 3.0 has more pins and gigabit speeds. It’s 3.0 and 3.1 which are essentially equivalent, and USB 3 Gen 1, and whatever else they called it
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 21 hours ago
3.0 is what they were originally called. I’m not always against retconning but this time it makes no sense. The Type-A plug is identical for all of them anyway.
The left two ones are obviously 9-pin, so 3.0. The right one is a different model (the metal is wrapped into a U, not C) but still could be a 3.0 one if the 5 extra pins are shorter than on the other connectors.