Students with dyslexia do get special treatment. There is no reason to discriminate against people lacking an unrelated skill and it’s not funny to demand it so we at least agree on something
Comment on Don't fix the problem just change the parameters
FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 day agoThis was only to reduce interruptions by some students (during a specific kind of UK exams), who had trouble determining the remaining time in the heat of the exam battle
I am not being funny but if someone is unable to read the time perhaps they shouldn’t be in the exam room in the first place.
It is like saying that all questions will be read out loud all the time and verbal answers recorded instead of written ones - because some students are illiterate.
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
I agree.
That being said, there’s a difference between having a disability and just not having had enough practice.
Just having an analogue clock in all rooms and halls of a school is a way to give people the opportunity to get the practice.
In higher grades you can have an analogue clock in front and a digital “cheat” one in the back. If they’re not sure, they can glance at that. And if that cheat clock is only in every other room. Most will learn because it’s easier that way.
When reading the clock comes as a topic of the curriculum in 1st or 2nd grade, having the teacher ask a student to read the time periodically from the classroom clock for a few months will make sure everyone has had at least some opportunities to practice.
Of course, if someone does have a problem bordering on disability, accomodate them. But a quarter of a class having it is really either bad luck or just bad methodology.
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 hours ago
The post talks explicitly about teenagers in exam halls. Don’t know if “exam hall” is a term for regular class rooms but either way it talks about teenagers. True, younger kids should learn it. Even if without practice, you have a hard time as a teenager, you can revive the skill later. Source: I did.
FelixCress@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
I am not referring to students with diagnosed disabilities - I am referring to the vast majority without.
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 hours ago
… in the context that many students can’t read analog clocks and shouldn’t get help. Pretty sure there is no official diagnosis for this so no problem and they don’t deserve to know how much time they have left in a biology exam. Again, there is no reason to discriminate against people lacking unrelated skills, if diagnosed or undiagnosed.
FelixCress@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Let me put it this way: if someone is not disabled and still unable or too lazy to understand the clock, they shouldn’t be in the exam room in the first place.
This is not a “discrimination” - most exams are for the people with a some level of the IQ, certainly above the level of a radiator. Or a stool.
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 19 hours ago
Ah, okay, I can’t take exams because my dyscalculia makes it difficult for me to read a clock (and it’s not worth my time to learn how to read them).
👍
FelixCress@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
No, you shouldn’t take exams if are an idiot - and if you do, don’t expect a special treatment because of your stupidity.
And no, as I said people with diagnosed disability are a different matter.
Hopefully that clarifies it for you.
papalonian@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Honestly if you can’t calculate things on an abacus you shouldn’t be in the exam room tbh. Sure, calculators have been invented and have ultimately replaced the abacus in nearly every facet of day to day life, but surely you know how to add beads together?
We’re letting kids use GPS to get to school now? What the street signs and constellations aren’t good enough for you?
FelixCress@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Let me rephrase it than - if someone is an idiot, they shouldn’t be in an exam room. If you are concerned about it, it may be because you fit the category.
Karl@literature.cafe 23 hours ago
What makes people who didn’t learn to read analog clocks idiots? If you have a thing about analog clocks, just keep it to yourself.
Or maybe because it’s just stupid af to judge people’s intelligence based on an unrelated life skill.
FelixCress@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Wrong question. The correct would be: what make people who are too lazy or too stupid to learn the clock idiots - but that would be a rhetorical one.
Intelligence is an ability to obtain knowledge and skills. If someone lacks both, it is a strong indication of them not having enough intelligence to obtain them.
Saganaki@lemmy.zip 23 hours ago
You don’t know how to use an abacus? You must be an idiot.
FelixCress@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
No. Don’t know how to use the clock? You shouldn’t be in the exam room.
papalonian@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Yikes.
Also, since you ran out of arguments and started correcting people’s spelling, *then.
FelixCress@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
“yikes” what?
Passing exams is not an entitlement, it is an achievement. If someone is an idiot unable to understand the clock, they shouldn’t be in the exam room in the first place - and they certainly shouldn’t expect someone will start explaining clock to them when they are supposed to write an exam.