Comment on Charlie Kirk in his own words.
LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 day agoOkay, let’s talk. Can you define ‘fascist’ for me?
What is fascism?
Comment on Charlie Kirk in his own words.
LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 day agoOkay, let’s talk. Can you define ‘fascist’ for me?
What is fascism?
glowie@infosec.pub 1 day ago
A fascist to me is someone, like the literal Nazis (and not just the hyperbolic use of the word today), who (by force [very important context]) wanted to enact their beliefs and doctrine. I didn’t see Charlie going around to campuses and forcibly ending people who disagree with him or trying to put people into camps for thinking differently than him.
LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Okay, thanks.
But a fascist by definition (not our own personal meaning, but the actual meaning) is:
‘a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement’
and that’s how I was using it. By that definition, which is the standard definition, Charlie Kirk was a fascist. He would have agreed with all of those things: he was far-right, authoritarian, and ultra-nationalist.
So, I am using the actual definition, where you are using your own personal definition.
Now, can you explain how I am a fascist?
glowie@infosec.pub 1 day ago
That is one part of the definition and isn’t including the important part that the reason it’s authoritarian is by its use of force to enact its beliefs.
My comment about those throwing around the term fascist being the fascist wasn’t directed at you and was broadly applicable to the people who are (by force) trying to silence anyone who disagrees with them.
LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
So you agree that fascism is far-right, authoritarian, and ultra-nationalist, you’re inly haggling that it’s ‘by force’.
Can you give me any citations that say fascism is only fascism once it uses force?
I am not throwing around that term, I assure you, and it seems so far that you don’t actually understand what that word means.
It’s a political ideology, nearly the opposite of socialism.
So, again, can you explain why you said my comment was fascist? By your definition, I did not use force. What about my comment, or my ideology that you seemed to get from it, was fascist?
i_miss_irc@discuss.online 22 hours ago
No, he didn’t go to campuses to forcibly end people who disagreed with him, instead he loaded buses full of armed and violent extremists and set them loose on the capital building in Washington D.C.
getdafugouttahere with this man of peace bullshit.
Eldritch@piefed.world 1 day ago
He was literally the leader of the new Hitler Juggen. Not every Nazi killed people. They just accepted it and cheered it on. The Nazis didn't start out slaughtering everyone they put into camps. It was their final solution. and only after massive incompetence on every other front.
If you are Jewish and you do not understand modern Republicans and the Trump administration in particular for what they are. You must be quite the cultural disappointment. That you have no problem defending Trump or his enablers. But don't agree with Bibi Netanyahu. Is some really fucked up cognitive dissonance that you need to address in yourself.
glowie@infosec.pub 1 day ago
Please show where I supported Trump or even Charlie for that matter? You people are just making up assumptions left and right. This is hilarious. I merely said someone with different opinions shouldn’t be killed for them. But apparently most everyone here is in a death cult who want anyone who disagrees with them to be silenced. I’m a LibSoc, anarchist btw.
Eldritch@piefed.world 1 day ago
You're here admonishing people for being glad he's gone.
Let's be clear. In a just society people shouldn't suffer genocide or slaughter for who they are. In a just society people shouldn't be slaughtered for their speech. We don't live in a just society. In case you weren't aware.
Charlie celebrated all of this. And all your screeching of death cult to anyone expressing their happiness at the passing of such a disease on society. Is uncalled for and hypocritical, seeing as Charlie Kirk himself was a spokesman for a death cult.
Don't get me wrong. I don't think his murder has made anything better. But until such time as society as a whole stops and refuses to elevate people like him. To give people like him a platform. I'm not going to admonish those who took the only action left to them in the face of an intolerant society. Or those that celebrate it.
Charlie Kirk stands to do more good in death than he would have ever been capable of in life. But only if we don't play their games. Calling out the people who rightfully celebrate the fact that Kirk suffered the fate he advocated for others to experience. any good person should celebrate that Kirk fell on his own sword.The question is why aren't you?
LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Nobody is making assumptions here but you.
Your comments have been very clear.
If you’re actually Jewish, you should be far more careful with the word ‘fascist’, and you should learn about history before throwing that word around. Fascism is happening now, so being judicial with that word is more important than ever.
0ops@piefed.zip 23 hours ago
Lol this guy doesn’t know what fascism is
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
14 Signs of Fascism: