Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records
Nougat@fedia.io 1 day ago
It's not even a real issue. The number of trans athletes is extremely small, and none of them are out there setting crazy records.
Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records
Nougat@fedia.io 1 day ago
It's not even a real issue. The number of trans athletes is extremely small, and none of them are out there setting crazy records.
damnedfurry@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It may not be an issue to you, but it’s an issue to every woman whose ranking is lower as a result. I imagine it especially hurts if you’re pushed out of first place in that way.
EponymousBosh@awful.systems 1 day ago
Wow, the 200m freestyle, the 500m freestyle, and the 1650m freestyle, huh? Did she ever compete in anything else, or were those numbers perhaps cherry-picked to make the situation look more dramatic than it actually is? Because if you look at her results holistically, she’s a very good swimmer, but she’s clearly not dominating 100% of the time the way she’s been portrayed.
At the NCAA competition where Thomas won one (1) race that conservatives cried and shit their pants over, a cis woman named Kate Douglass set 18 new records. Lia Thomas set zero new records. And crunching the rest of the numbers bears this out: she was a good swimmer before and after transition, but she’s not some unbeatable powerhouse that cis women have no chance at winning against.
arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
It should also be noted that a college athlete's times and rankings would presumably improve every year. Freshmen competing against seniors are just less likely to win (in most sports at least). IIRC I saw an analysis of her rankings that indicated the improvement was within normal bounds for year-over-year improvement.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
No one goes from 500th to 1st year over year lol.
damnedfurry@lemmy.world 1 day ago
If anyone can go from 554th to 5th in any sport/event just by competing among the other sex, nothing else changing, then that obviously indicates something. You can’t handwave that away.
Her personal 100m freestyle time dropping less than a quarter of a second post-transition is honestly a bigger indicator that transition is not making a substantial difference, because that angle completely removes the ‘chance’ element in your opponents being different people.
Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Really? "Every"? You asked every single one of them, did you? Or are you just talking out your arse on the behalf of hundreds of people you don't even know?
damnedfurry@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The very fact that their ranking is lower than what it should be is an issue in and of itself, your disingenuous mockery notwithstanding.
Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
But they're placed exactly where they should be? If they should be placed higher, that's where they'd be… seems like you're the one getting mad over a skill issue on other people's behalf tbh. It's weird.
You're acting as though Lia Thomas didn't have every right to compete as she did, despite fulfilling all the eligibility criteria that were in place at the time, so your argument at this stage seems equally applicable to all the cis women who outperformed her, too, but you're not whining for the benefit of all the poor womanses that were denied the opportunity to place higher than they did by them, are you?
Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Former competitive swimmer here. I’m fine with it.