Comment on HELP HIM.

stray@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Isn’t this standard practice ?

  source

  • apotheotic@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Slaughtering animals is standard practice in the meat industry, what’s standard practice gotta do with anything?

    source
• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  What part of them is unsafe for work?

  source

  • angrystego@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    They didn’t say it’s NSFW, just that they’d appreciate the blur. Not everyone wants to look at such things randomly.

    source

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      NSFW means NSFW, though, and not “my personal appreciation filter”.

      source

      • angrystego@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        No, you’re right. It would be just nice to use filters for potentially triggering content.

        source
      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Animal abuse is both.

        Right or wrong on whether this qualifies (I don’t think it does, personally, especially compared to what else happens to lab rats) you’re disagreeing on whether it counts and using dishonest rhetoric to try and reframe the dispute.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • stray@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    It’s been put forth that we should have other kinds of censor tags on Lemmy, but NSFW is currently the only one supported. It’s been used here and on other sites for disturbing imagery of murders, spiders for arachnophobes, etc. Even without that, a text tag of [animal abuse] facilitates the use of client-side content filters.

    source

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Even so, still not NSFW. Wondering “It’s tagged NSFW but is it actually NSFW?” creates its own issues & nuisances.

      source
• OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Out of sight, out of mind

  source

  • apotheotic@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    That’s how the meat industry thrives, for sure. However you can protest against things and also not want to see them uncensored on your feed

    source
  • stray@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Do I need to look at images of dead Palestinian kids too? Does wanting to go about my day in a measure of peace mean I don’t really care?

    source
• M0oP0o@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • stray@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I’m literally eating vegan nuggets right now, but thanks for being an ass.

    source
  • apotheotic@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Dawg we’re vegan we fucking know, we just don’t want to see this shit uncensored on our feed.

    source

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Oh, I am not vegan. I just hate when people try and sanitize their view of the world.

      source

      • apotheotic@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Idk how u can look at that shit and not be vegan but alright

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Pls put the image in a spoiler tag to stop the barrage of reports. 🙏

    source

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      That is my very point. It is not censored in wikipedia (and it should not be), why would it need that here?

      If you want to ban me over it please do, but I don’t think science (memes or otherwise) and censorship are compatible.

      source

      • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Nah, fam. I let people have opinions, but I have to remove it. It’s about common courtesy, not ideology.

        source

        • -> View More Comments