Comment on Anon learns a new spell
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 10 months agoNo, they’re a combustion event. An actual explosion (detonation, pre ignition) is really bad news for an engine.
Firearms use a self oxidising propellant, so it would be quite easy to say that just doesn’t work.
rtxn@lemmy.world 10 months ago
What, pray tell, do you think is in gunpowder? It’s not magic dust that goes bang. It’s a pre-mixed, pre-compressed mixture of fuel and oxidiser. When used in a gun, whether it’s a muzzle-loader or a cartridge, the confined combustion of the mixture generates thermal energy and expanding gases that impart kinetic energy on a moving component (the piston or a projectile). The only difference is that the combustion event in an ICE is subsonic (deflagration) while the combustion in a gun is supersonic (detonation).
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
So what you’re saying is there’s a fundamental difference between the two?
rtxn@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Yes, there are differences. That’s why one is called deflagration and the other is called detonation. But the chemical and thermodynamic processes are identical, and that’s what you seem to misunderstand.
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Dude, you’re being a pedant in the comments of a Harry Potter shitpost.
dohpaz42@lemmy.world 10 months ago
@Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works is correct.
I should’ve done my homework before going all “well akshullay 🤓” on them (sorry!).
The only similarities between the two is that they both are chemical reactions that produce a rapid release of energy. But past that, they are much different in how they get to that point.