Putting the burden on users is a very Google thing to do, my dude.
Comment on It is what it is
Bieren@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s Google. If you are shocked by this, you deserve to be tracked.
the_q@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That’s simply not true. People can’t be expected to know what’s going on under the hood of services designed specifically to simplify things for non-technical users and conceal what’s under the hood.
Bieren@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
This is more about knowing Google is an advertising company and makes money from selling your data. Than it is knowing how the application works and what it does under the covers.
plyth@feddit.org 22 hours ago
Then don’t allow them to use those services without a license. It’s cars or chemicals all over again.
chiliedogg@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Are people required to know how their car works?
Do people have to understand chemistry to buy gasoline or mercury thermometers?
plyth@feddit.org 20 hours ago
No. However many things are regulated.
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
No, not really. There are low bars; this isn’t one of them. This is not something I expect average people who aren’t into technology to anticipate. Nerds like me, yeah. But not the public. Though we’re getting to that point.
Zacryon@feddit.org 1 day ago
That’s called victim blaming.
But yeah. I really hope people stop using Google products. Google is evil.
Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 1 day ago
Be an informed consumer or a sorry one. It’s anyone’s choice.
seralth@lemmy.world 1 day ago
To be fair it is in this case the victims is more at fault then not for misusing, misunderstanding and not reading the terms of service or explicate use case.
Like this would be like getting mad at your doctor for keeping notes over you and sharing them with other doctors. But not your random friends or strangers.
Incognito mode has said it’s always been local privacy only not that it doesn’t track or record you, nor prevents others from doing so.
It’s just turning off history basically.