Comment on Tory candidate shared post using foul language towards struggling parents

• brewery@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Lots of people don’t know how to find good deals, and funnily enough that is impossible without the Internet and good knowledge of how to avoid the various traps laid out for people. I learned about this stuff and general computing myself, not at school. Most of my friends and family still don’t know a lot of this so rely on me for advice.

  It’s easy for us to judge but imagine you had no Internet. What would you do? You’d go into a mobile phone store where they are engineered to make you leave with the highest contact possible, and you don’t know enough to challenge them. Or you search on a friends phone but what comes up is SEO gamed to again, give you a high contract. Or you know there’s Vodafone as they advertise heavily so go straight to their website. Funnily enough, the contracts they initially advertise are pretty high and they don’t advertise their cheaper sister brand talk mobile.

  Now, imagine trying to do all this when your PIP payment has not come through so you have £6 in your account. You try going to the job centre but they just say you have to go online. The council can’t help. Your friends don’t know enough to help. So you desperately are trying to get a phone contact to figure out what’s going on and decide £30 sounds reasonable and it’s less of a concern than trying to find money to feed my kids today.

  source

  • Borkingheck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I dunno man. I used to be on the dole, it was something like 56 quid a week? Anyway, I didn’t have the money to go into a mobile phone shop and get shopped into a 30 quid contract. I had the bog standard pay as you go.

    Seo and getting dunked on by salespersons are not good excuses for why the state should manage a persons money. If you are skint, you tend to be really good at budgeting.

    The issues tories have is with people who want to have it ‘all’ and not cut their cloth accordingly.

    Granted I’m fairly sure if every poor person sat on their hands all day, they’d complain about that too.

    source
• mbgid@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I feel that debating whether a £30 p/m contract counts as a luxury or not just serves to further dehumanize those experiencing poverty.

  source

  • Borkingheck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yes. But we will continue to do it. I have no idea when it will stop.

    source
• Oneeightnine@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Maybe they took the contract out before being forced into welfare? Last I checked companies aren’t overly happy if you ask to end your contract early.

  source

  • Borkingheck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That’s possible and will happen, but most likely it’s that within the group who can’t afford a 30 quid contract, there will be a contingent who will take it out anyway and that smaller group will get the headlines and that’s what they will chat about.

    It ain’t as sexy to talk about then people who budget relentlessly to make ends meet and still struggle.

    source
• Peppycito@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I get 10 texts a week just to authenticate things. And I’m not even looking for a job.

  source

  • Borkingheck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yeah, I agree with this. However there’s prolly more people who were not doing well financially prior to the contract compared to those who were fine and then suddenly in the shits.

    Tories are weird, they want us spending money and aspiring us to achieve more yet seemingly want people to sit in a dark room eating gruel.

    source
  • Borkingheck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Texts are typically free these days, especially at 30 quid a month.

    source

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Texts are typically free these days, especially at 30 quid a month.

      I think you mean to say, texts cost $30/month.

      source

      • Borkingheck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Yes.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Hogger85b@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  There is some element of Vimes boots here. People cannot afford a new smartphone outright even though that is cheaper long-term, so have to take an option that gives a phone ..phones these days are designed to break after 18months as "updates" grind them down

  source

  • Borkingheck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That theory is a bit lost when someone doesn’t need the latest smartphone to begin with. Even if they were to break after 18 months, which they aren’t and the market is certainly moving towards devices lasting longer, its easy to pick up a decent mid range or flagship for half that price monthly or comparable second hand.

    source