brewery
@brewery@feddit.uk
- Comment on Sikhs 'demonised' after murder, says community leader 7 hours ago:
Ok, so you’re the genius who never does anything that doesn’t make completely logic sense because of traditions, culture, upbringing or even just making mistakes, as opposed to every single human society in history. Not sure why you brought up that particular practice which is abhorrent. Presumably you are against people wearing crosses, tattoos of significant people or events in somebodies life, football shirts, or any other symbol of something to care about.
I say this as an atheist by the way. I don’t believe in religion but who am I to tell people the beliefs they care about are dumb without knowing anything about them.
- Comment on Sikhs 'demonised' after murder, says community leader 14 hours ago:
Sikhism is less than 600 years old which is not ancient.
The religion requires 5 symbols including this one. The purpose of the kirpan is to always be ready to defend yourself and others regardless of religion, as part of an idea of being a spiritual warrior, because at the time when it was formed, their land was being invaded and people of multiple religions being forcebly and violently converted to another religion and different way of life. Other symbols represent different things.
They used to be long swords but are now dagger sized. Most religious Sikhs nowadays in places like the UK and Canada wear a symbolic one, which either cannot be opened, is dull and/or very small so they have already adapted to living here. They don’t take them on airplanes for obvious reasons but still want to keep on their traditions. Like any group, there are dickheads like this guy but in reality, anybody could chose to carry a knife and use it.
It literally says in the article “Under current legislation, a practising Sikh may wear a small, curved blade, known as a Kirpan, close to the body but drawing it in an act of aggression is illegal.” This is similar to people going camping, or with work tools. If you’re not a danger and have a good excuse for having it then you are acting legally but the second you use it aggressively or to hurt someone it’s the same for everyone.
Please don’t call a central concept of a religion or any way of living dumb without looking up or knowing any facts about it.
- Comment on Anger Over Oxford Union’s Tommy Robinson Invite Amid Suggestions of GB News Deal 2 days ago:
Part of me would love to see him destroyed in a real debate with people who will easily tear apart any of his “arguments”. There is no way I’d be touching Redorm TV to watch it though
- Comment on Nearly 500 seriously injured in e-scooter collisions in Great Britain last year 3 days ago:
Good point, enforcement is another important issue. I find it annoying how many illegal e-cycles are around and tolerated. I bet all the batteries causing fires are not on legal e-bikes. Generally though, police enforcement of anything road based has declined massively as their funding and numbers have been reduced by austerity.
I regularly see car drivers on their phones, speeding, going through red lights or other issues. Let’s be fair though, if you wanted to improve road safety, cars and trucks would be much higher on the list than e-bikes or e-scooters full stop. Once we get a handle on those then let’s go after all the illegal e-bikes and e-scooters etc
- Comment on Nearly 500 seriously injured in e-scooter collisions in Great Britain last year 3 days ago:
To be fair you’ve got a great point there. I was thinking more about a regulated speed. I wish I could keep up with traffic speeds to feel safer. Going 15mph in a 20mph is the worst. Cars still want to overtake but do so more dangerously because of the slight gap in speed.
I would have to question 30mph though only because I think some research would need to be done for safety. It’s one thing being in something with crumple zones. It’s another being on a stick where there is no expectation to wear appropriate clothing or anything. You have so much less suspension, size, weight or anything to give you some flex, even compared to a cycle or motorbike.
I say this thinking that e-scooters are for urban areas where the speed limit should be 20mph anyway. There should be cycling infrastructure to make use of but only if limited to 20mph alongside e-cycles being increased to that. Any higher would be dangerous to normal cycles. You can’t expect to go 30mph on a cycle lane
- Comment on Nearly 500 seriously injured in e-scooter collisions in Great Britain last year 3 days ago:
This is a result of a failure in government, policy optics and must not being realistic. E-scooters are illegal on public roads unless they are part of rental schemes. Therefore, the only suppliers and riders are those willing to break the law, and we have a completely skewed view on the danger of the machines because of that.
If they actually regulated them and offered a sensible approach to regulation, e-scooters would be safer (minimum battery requirements like cut offs and cell dividers), limited to 15mph, and normal people would be using them.
I want an e-scooter for times when my e-bike feels too much, like getting there train or bus for longer distances. It would be great to use it on either side of a train journey.
I have a driving licence, I would wear a helmet, I have third party insurance for my cycle, I would never go on pavements, I would buy a safe option from my local cycle shop, it would be limited, and I would be less of a danger to others and myself. I can’t though because it is illegal, even though for some reason I can legally own an e-cycle which has basically the same parts.
- Comment on One in five girls say they experienced harassment before age 12 3 days ago:
I remember in year 7 was walking behind girl in the year above between the bus stop and school gate. She was maybe 13 ish (I think). She was one of the hottest girls to us but looked her age to adults.
The looks from some of the men in a line of cars who stuck in traffic was just horrifying and stuck with me. Some proper leered at her, and one who was a passenger even nudged the driver to look. She didn’t react or anything and remember thinking poor girl, she must get this all the time to be so used to it.
- Comment on UK needs to urgently install air conditioning in schools and care homes, climate campaigners say 5 days ago:
They have buildings and infrastructure designed with the weather in mind though, with generations of knowledge used to make it suitable before AC was a thing, for instance external blinds everywhere, orientation of the building to the sun/winds. Our schools were built to retain heat as much as possible
- Comment on Five toys on sale in Britain found to contain asbestos in tests for Guardian 1 week ago:
Watched this just yesterday - brilliant explanation of the problem and I ended it thinking I wonder what the issue is in the UK
- Comment on The Met and Britain’s imperial double standard 1 week ago:
It is disgraceful. They rightly came down like a ton of bricks on anybody who went to ISIS but here are documented cases of citizens committing war crimes and they can’t be bothered.
Justice is only justice when it is applied equally and fairly
- Comment on Nigel Farage bought £1.4m property after receiving £5m gift from British crypto billionaire 2 weeks ago:
It was In Clacton right? The area he represents and cases deeply about
- Comment on Keir Starmer sets out changes to education, health and courts in king’s speech 2 weeks ago:
Does anybody else read this as “we will continue to aim to do the things we said we’ll do, and probably should’ve done with our massive parliamentary majority, but forgot because of trying to copy reform, so let’s five the same kind of agenda where we tweak some stuff but don’t really change anything… But don’t worry, when the next speech is happening, we’ll only mention 95% of the same thjngs again…”
- Comment on Palestine Action Activists to Be Sentenced As Terrorists in Move Kept Secret From Jury and Public 2 weeks ago:
I guess we should also be thinking, how many people have been convicted since 9/11 under these secret courts. Yes, most were probably actual terrorists but it would be certain that many innocent people were convicted if you can’t try them in courts designed to mitigate that (jury + beyond resolvable doubt or whatever the term is)
- Comment on Jury Fails to Convict Pro-Palestine Activist Over Social Media Posts 2 weeks ago:
Exactly true. Whatever they’re called, something like will always happen under the conditions theyre in
- Comment on Jury Fails to Convict Pro-Palestine Activist Over Social Media Posts 2 weeks ago:
So their argument was that “everyone has the right to defend themselves” is not allowed but basically everyone in public life being felt forced to say “Israel has the right to defend itself” every time when talking about anything to do with Israel or Palestine for quite some time is absolutely fine.
From reading around his posts, which mentions not supporting Hamas but feels close to saying he isn’t surprised they exist without saying it explicitly, and it feels to me that what he is saying is that Hamas is a horrible terrorist organisation but the people of Palestine or any group in the world that is being occupied illegally and subject to a genocide should be able to defend themselves from the attackers.
Maybe it’s just too nuanced for me though to understand.
- Comment on Two men convicted over filming of antisemitic TikTok videos in London 2 weeks ago:
I read the link, didn’t see anything that adds any real context. I"m not victim blaming. I haven’t seen the videos or sought them out or anything so have no idea if they are guilty or not. My point is, I’ve seen enough recently to not trust the news or the Met to believe that they are guilty from the article, the arrest and now the CPS report you shared. They could well have said and done horrible stuff.
Yes, if they recorded themselves crossing the line into hate direct, they’re pretty dumb too
- Comment on Two men convicted over filming of antisemitic TikTok videos in London 2 weeks ago:
Not as much as I used to
- Comment on Two men convicted over filming of antisemitic TikTok videos in London 2 weeks ago:
I should be able to look at this headline and article and think, fuck those people and move on. Instead, I can only think, what did they actually say or do, what did the other people say before, during and after. I don’t want to defend anti Semitism but can’t be sure when it’s actually being committed or not unless I see it all myself
- Comment on [Video] UK Anti-Zionist activist stopped by police at a train station and told she was under investigation after a train passenger reported her for "denying the Holocaust" 2 weeks ago:
It would be a real shame if everybody here started texting that number for every thing we saw - people with seats on the chairs (destruction of property), littering in public, excessive drunkenness, heard them swearing (public indecency), watching videos without headphones, playing music, erm…, talking in a quiet coach, pressing the open button too aggressively, not moving down the train,
- Comment on [Video] LBC interviewer exposes the double standard of ex minister calling for the banning of Palestine marches 3 weeks ago:
Really sums up the situation well, although it’s interesting that his co-hosts on the News Agents weren’t able to offer the same challenges or journalistic questioning of a sitting Government Minister (who is incidentally involved in scrapping of juries). Jon Sopal even offered up a comment about “the hate marches” himself, which doesn’t seem right.
I live near Epsom and felt terrorised by the far right riots recently taking over the high street and trying to invade a random house that turned out to be an adult refuge. Why aren’t the people who are literally filming themselves doing the same all over there UK being proscribed?
Ever since 9/11, Muslims have been targeted, vilified and called terrorists in the UK. Even those not involved at all were expected to “look within” and we had the travesty of Prevent. I completey oppose this form of thinking but why isn’t the Jewish community being held to the same amount when we know they have hosted ex-IDF soldiers in this country and British citizens have, completely openly, joined the IDF and committed war crimes. Going to “defend their homeland” is fine is it for them but a 15 year old who was groomed online to join what she thought was a fight for her homeland is stripped off all citizenship and left to rot in a refuge camp abroad. Again, I do not condone their actions but it just shows what the State can do when it wants to.
It is the double standards and hypocrisy that really stands out in all of this. We should be doing our best to stop all violence against anybody - violence by a British backed state against children using weapons that we know passes through our country, violence against any Jews, Muslims or any other religion in this country, violence against refugees, violence against women, and so on
- Comment on Wireless Festival cancelled after Kanye West blocked from coming to UK 1 month ago:
What are you on about? Don’t believe the news and social media posts. It is fine here. It’s not perfect but it’s not a punishment to come here
- Comment on Rubbish and recycling in England: what’s changing and why it matters 1 month ago:
Can you compost all food waste including bones and processed foods?
- Comment on Huge crowds take part in London march against the far right – live 2 months ago:
I was there too! Agree - everybody was super chill and friendly.
Did you manage to get into Trafalgar Square? I think I got lucky that they opened up as I walked past
- Comment on Scrapping North Sea windfall tax would not reduce UK energy bills, say experts 2 months ago:
Why not leave them alone for now and then when the rest of the world has run out, we’ve still got the option to use them or hopefully, the best thing possible for humanity - they never get used! We do run the risk of being invaded though - by USA or Russia (can’t remember the name but thinking of a Scandinavian drama about that)
- Comment on Birmingham Crowned The Least Walkable City In The UK 2 months ago:
So true. It’s just purely a weird way of calculating this. Birmingham has come on leaps and bounds with walk ability in the city centre and suburbs. On the few occasions I’m there, I love taking a walk around the city centre noticing the changes and less cars you have to deal with. Nobody would be able to change that you need a bus to get to a suburb housing this attraction.
- Comment on UK recruiter emerges from insolvency for third time, avoiding millions owed in tax 2 months ago:
It feels to me that the only mentions of patriotism are generally against immigrants, who don’t really do shit like this and have been shown to be a positive to the exchequer.
Anyone who has done this to avoid legitimate taxes, anyone who moves to Singapore / Dubai / Monaco etc to avoid taxes, and especially anyone who took advantage during Covid to make a quick buck instead of helping during an international crisis, are deeply unpatriotic and should be vilified by everyone
- Comment on Asylum seekers who break law to have support removed 2 months ago:
They have learned nothing from the by election. Stop fucking pandering to the supposed reform vote that is not real.
- Comment on Rural drivers to face steepest bills under UK’s mileage-based electric vehicle tax 3 months ago:
Surely this is already the case where petrol taxes are higher if you drive more. I don’t think it’s fair for me to not be taxed less in an urban environment considering I drive much less
- Comment on British inflation hits lowest in almost a year 3 months ago:
Not sure I care anymore. The UK is for the wealthy only and we can only try to struggle through, whether it’s through inflation, poorer services or more tax. Until we address the power dynamics, wealth inequality and tax havens (City of London, Jersey, Guernsey, etc), I could nor give a flying fuck what inflation is quarter to quarter. Prices and housing costs are already fucked
- Comment on Police Wasted £10m Enforcing Unlawful Palestine Action Ban 3 months ago:
I’m really torn about this. We want police by consent and to have some discrepancy to do the right / moral thing but don’t want to give them too much power to choose what laws they enforce. You don’t want Nazi type “just following orders” but you don’t want them targeting left-wing protestors more because they lean right-wing (the Met police at least who let’s not forget, targetted/target women, queer people, black people, etc much more than the right wing)
The laws are made by Parliament and the current labour government should take the full blame for proscribing this group. The anti terrorism laws are so harsh that I can believe the police had no choice but to arrest them.
The absurdity of arresting the numbers they did, the type of people they did, and this £10m cost should have made the government change the law itself.