Comment on What's going on with Borderlands 2? Steam is giving it for free, but the game has 23% positive recent reviews.

• Cataphract@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Sincerely thank you for commenting. I was completely dumbfounded with @Warl0k3@lemmy.world’s statement and wasn’t sure if I wanted to waste my time with a response if it was just trolling.

  source

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    If that’s all it takes to dumbfound you, I am profoundly jealous. Anyways.

    Those aren’t the claims fauxliving was making. They claim that there is no indication of taketwo requesting root level access and they’re strictly right, there is no language requesting that permission (or equivalents) (but I doubt that would matter to TakeTwo since they could argue it’s implicit)

    They then claim that there has been no change to the game to include kernel level anticheat, which is also true.

    What you presented does nothing to substantiate or refute those claims, just the claims made in the OP. Fauxliving’s comment was off base, sure, but substantially their points are correct.

    source

    • Cataphract@lemmy.ml ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      “What you presented does nothing to substantiate or refute”

      There is nothing in the TOS that requires you to submit to a rootkit

      We also may use internal and third-party anti-cheat technologies

      prepare to be even more profoundly jealous because I’m profoundly dumbfounded at this point.

      source

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I don’t really know how else to phrase this, but I’ll give it a shot anyways: Anti-cheat isn’t intrinsically linked to root level permissions. It’s inclusion in a section about data sources compounds that concept. That is the claim that you are now making, and which isn’t supported by the section you’ve cited.

        source

        • -> View More Comments