Comment on I hope i don't get downvoted for this

• Zozano@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  You’re not picking up what I’m laying down.

  I’m not arguing that feet and breasts aren’t capable of proving sexual stimulation from a first person perspective. I’m saying at from a third person perspective, theres nothing about them which inherently arousing; that arousal stems from novelty.

  source

  • lowleekun@ani.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Just like mouth, ears and all kind of body parts are capable of providing sexual stimulation without being considered arousing in the sense we still view breasts/ass and such.

    source

    • Zozano@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Precisely. It’s amazing how people have misinterpreted what I’ve been saying lol.

      source

      • lowleekun@ani.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        People get emotional around this topic pretty fast. Don’t take the downvotes personally, i found your statements perfectly rational.

        source
  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I’m saying that from a third person perspective, theres nothing about them which inherently arousing

    There seems to be ample evidence to the contrary. Whole pornographic industries exist to cater to people aroused by pictures of people in various states of undress.

    source

    • Zozano@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      You’re still not getting it. The key word here is ‘inherently’.

      The sexual interest in people of different states of undress, or specific attire, is just another form of novelty, and influenced by culture.

      source

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        The key word here is ‘inherently’.

        Name something that is inherently sexy.

        source

        • -> View More Comments