Comment on 70% of games that require internet get destroyed
CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 day ago
-
Link to the games list: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1at1k7qIo5dgPp6K1aCrYIyAgNOjY-IhF
-
Link to the European Citizens’ Initiative: eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home stopkillinggames.com
Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Two more months to go and more than 50% left to reach 1 million signatures. It’s sad to see that with how many people game, this petition has so little reach. I guess we’ll have to wait till Fortnite is shut down, then suddenly many more will care that their childhood game is gone forever.
ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
Unfortunately, I think it was just a lack of awareness that the petition in existed in certain countries where Ross just didn’t have enough reach, possibly due to language barriers. A big push from native speakers of those countries with large audiences, like streamers, could’ve pushed it over the edge.
tal@lemmy.today 1 day ago
I don’t know if I fully agree with the petition, but I do think that there are some real problems with the status quo.
I also think that either a legislature or courts need to provide legal criteria for the good or service division with games. I think that there probably need to be “good” games, "serviceʾ games, and possibly even games that have a component of both.
But I’m not in the EU or UK.
I also am kind of puzzled by this:
www.stopkillinggames.com/faq
It doesn’t sound like it was as of 2020 in the US, at least on the good/service distinction:
carltonfields.com/…/youve-been-served-legal-effec…
ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
The creator of the Stop Killing Games campaign did a segment about the viability of fighting it in the US in a segment here: youtu.be/DAD5iMe0Xj4?t=1168
tl:dr, the motivated lawyer he talked with on it eventually concluded that it’d be nearly impossible to fight here due to how slanted the courts are toward businesses.