Yes.
Comment on Well, that's no ordinary rabbit!
SquirrelX@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Has anyone actually tried representing dinosaurs like fluffy (or very feathery) animals?
tauren@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
SquirrelX@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Thank you.
mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Neeed images
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 weeks ago
Most dinosaur recreations now just go “what would a bird with this skeleton look like?”
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
unfortunately a lot of art just sorta glues a bunch of feathers to a deinonychus and calls it a velociraptor, but here’s some stuff i feel makes more sense.
(Also side note: t.rex probably was actually mostly naked, however it was likely skin rather than scales, like a giant plucked monster turkey, which IMO is significantly worse.)
cynar@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Image
A 15’ chicken with teeth would be terrifying.
Donkter@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The common art keeps giving them long feathers on their arms but I would have assumed long feathers only evolved on flying birds and most of the feathers on the flightless dinosaurs would be pretty uniform.
cynar@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’ve also come across these. There’s a lot we don’t know, all of these could be entirely wrong.
Image
Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
Sometimes we might never really know. It is part of the mystery. Can you imagine if you had dinosaurs that had trunks like elephants?