Comment on Pens in Space

• nyctre@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Technically, I think they’re different. Flammable means that it can be lit on fire, like wood or something. Whereas inflammable means it can catch fire on its own, like gas, for example.

  source

  • chuckleslord@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Image

    Synonyms, true synonyms. No real difference between them (except don’t use inflammable in safety situations, for above reasons)

    source
  • glups@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Credit to you for the self-correction though

    source
  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    saying that “gas” is able to catch fire on its own is stretching it :) A gas mix typically still needs a spark, unlike: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergolic_propellant <- that stuff can “catch fire” on its own. But even there - it needs to be mixed, so technically, one component requires the other to ignite.

    source

    • nyctre@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Yeah, my bad, shit example.

      source
• JackbyDev@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  It makes more sense if you think of it as enflammable. Indent and indebted at examples of this “in-” prefix. merriam-webster.com/…/flammable-or-inflammable

  source
• militaryintelligence@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  United States education system

  source
• Wanderer@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Flammable isn’t a word.

  Just Americans got confused by it so it became a word.

  source

  • Hexarei@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    So then it is a word

    source

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      A word made for stupid people, yes.

      source