Comment on light pollution
alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 weeks agoIt’s not actually less safe. No study was able to show a link between light and safety.
Comment on light pollution
alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 weeks agoIt’s not actually less safe. No study was able to show a link between light and safety.
callcc@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Interesting. Where do you take your knowledge?
alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I did my PhD on light pollution. I don’t have the references on hand but it is well known in the field.
Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 1 week ago
C’mon pal, we know you have at least 3-4 copies of that dissertation lying around.
alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
I mostly worked on the physics side, being a physicist. But I did dug up a reference for you. You can start from there: doi.org/10.3310/phr03110
ebolapie@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I don’t have a PhD but I do hate light pollution. And while I’m too lazy to look up a source, I can offer an explanation. Shitty outdoor lighting produces a lot of glare. Meaning if you’re on a path that is lit with very bright lights, especially if you can see the bulb directly, your eyes won’t adapt to the lower light and anything in shadow becomes invisible. Pools of darkness in brightly lit areas are a terrific place to hide.
Anecdotally, problem people are also afraid of the dark. There’s a park near my house that serves as a shortcut between two streets. It has two paths. One is a brightly lit paved walkway next to the baseball diamonds, and the other is an unlit service road. I usually take the unlit path because glare tends to give me headaches. I have seen more sketchy shit happen on the brightly lit path from afar than I have ever seen on the dark path.
FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Just backing up the point, I took a course on light pollution and this was the “common myth” our professor debunked on the first lesson.