NOW I get it. Thanks.
Comment on omg
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
What if I told you that it works for any number 𝑥 you replace 2 with? (Except for 0 but still working for 𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝑥→0)
shalafi@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Comment on omg
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
What if I told you that it works for any number 𝑥 you replace 2 with? (Except for 0 but still working for 𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝑥→0)
NOW I get it. Thanks.
sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
… where x is positive.
Otherwise it has an imaginary component and is complex.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Nope, it still works even then.