Comment on Marc Rober shows why Tesla's camera-only self-driving system is dangerous

Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• harryprayiv@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I wouldn’t exactly call that a deep dive.

  source

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    The channel is for 5-year-olds, they would drown in a real deep dive

    source

    • brrt@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Easy: „If you want to learn more check out our second channel where we explain in depth how we approached this topic, the technology used and what we learned.“

      source
    • harryprayiv@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      💯

      source
• Bahnd@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Im shocked Disney isnt theowing a fit over that. Their legal team must be busy this week

  source

  • chetradley@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Getting into a legal battle with an immensely popular YouTuber would probably cost them a lot more in bad publicity than they would reasonably make from a lawsuit. I guarantee someone at Disney is doing or already has done the calculations.

    source

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      theguardian.com/…/disney-wrongful-death-lawsuit-d…

      Disney is not scared of lawyering up.

      source

      • chetradley@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Oh I’m not disagreeing with you there. In this case, they were being brought in as a defendant for a wrongful death case. The probably realized there was some potential PR damage from considering invoking the Disney+ terms (rightfully so, fuck them), but I’m sure they weighed that against the liability of the wrongful death suit.

        In the case of the video, I’d be surprised if they went after Robert, because I don’t see them gaining more from this case than they would lose in publicity. I could be wrong though, perhaps we’ll see!

        source