As far as civil rights that women do not have (or are being taken away), all three articles only speak of abortions. Men already can’t have abortions.
You really thought you were cooking here, didn’t you?
Comment on Welp.
sfu@lemm.ee 5 weeks agoAs far as civil rights that women do not have (or are being taken away), all three articles only speak of abortions. Men already can’t have abortions.
You really thought you were cooking here, didn’t you?
LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
The right over his own body. Name me one law that restricts mens bodily autonomy. I’ll wait.
sfu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
tomkatt@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Not going to be playing “honest question” with you, since it’s obviously not honest, and you’re not open to changing your viewpoint. No, sometimes it’s about critical care in life threatening situations, often involving pregnancies that cannot be brought to term anyway. Women are literally dying from preventable issues due to pregnancy complications. And that’s not even getting into the concept of women’s care for horrible situations like rape.
If you can’t see the issue here, you’re part of the problem. I knew that already, but thanks for confirming.
sfu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
beejboytyson@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
There we go. Be a man, not a pussy. Just say what you just said w/o the pageantry. God cons are such cowards.
LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
I’m not here to debate it either. There’s no debate. You’re not pro life. You’re just anti women and use it as a shield for your bigotry.
sfu@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago