Part of me wonders what would happen if you released a movie in two parts at the same time. If it were direct to streaming, that would essentially just be a mini (micro?) series. But in theaters… I’m not sure that sort of thing has been done
Comment on James Cameron Teases ‘Avatar 3’ Will Be Even Longer Than ‘The Way Of Water’
makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I generally believe most movies should be shorter and that there’s a lot of room for addition by subtraction. That said, if a movie earns its runtime then I don’t think there’s an upper limit to how long it can be. Lawrence of Arabia is 3 hours and 45 minutes and it’s incredible, I don’t think I’d cut anything in it besides the long black intro screen which is a relic of its time. I would say justifying that run time gets exponentially harder past a certain point.
With Way of Water sitting at 3 hours and 12 minutes I do think Avatar 3 needs an intermission if it’s going to be longer. Asking people to sit and be fully engaged for 3 and a half hours is a big ask and having a chance to go to the bathroom, get snacks, stretch your legs, etc is needed for something that massive
Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 1 day ago
djsaskdja@reddthat.com 1 day ago
I don’t think people would be willing to pay twice.
Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 21 hours ago
They are if you just release them a year apart.
djsaskdja@reddthat.com 19 hours ago
Right, but you said released at the same time.
Steve@communick.news 1 day ago
People would pay a dozen times if it was good
RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Especially if kids are going to see it.