It’s referencing a coping mechanism when you lose in team-based multiplayer games to blame other team-mates instead of looking inward and accepting you might be the problem.
“GG” is short for good game, it’s basically the polite online equivalent to a handshake after a sports match, or any competition really.
“No heals” is the blaming of ones team for not helping out, in this case healing which is often done by a designated healer class which a player can pick in the game. Purpose of this class is replenishing health points to other fellow team members, something which is needed to give the team a better chance of winning as the opposing team is trying to kill you.
So logically, if the healing is either bad or lacking, one could surmise that “no heals” is a valid criticism, but “it takes two to tango” as the saying goes, and if you run away from the healer, out of their range or too far into enemy territory that the healer can’t help you without dying themself, then the problem isn’t the healer - it’s you.
Comment on Your body after losing an online game
ech@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Anyone got an ELI65? I don’t do multiplayer games like that.
RedSnt@feddit.dk 5 weeks ago
Zkuld@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
gg = good game, sarcastic is this case no heals = blames the healers for not healing enough as the reason for the loss
the player tries to absolve themselves by blaming theirs teammates
Baggie@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
Core problem you come across in multiplayer team games is that there is often required support roles that are less generally desirable to play than the usual gameplay experience. E.g. people want to shoot guns rather than heal teammates.
So when you lose a team game, it’s often pretty easy to look at what your team was doing, and figure it what vital support roles weren’t being filled.
This can lead to what we see in the meme here, where you reflexively blame your teammates not fulfilling support obligations collectively, healing in this case. This blame assignment also purposely glosses over the fact that you were perfectly capable of identifying the problem, yet didn’t switch to a support role yourself. This helps shift the blame, and absolves you of the responsibility of the loss, managing your own emotional state.
Because this helps regulate your own emotional state, it becomes reinforced behaviour, and you become reliant on it over time. You point out issues that aren’t there, become hyper critical of others, anything to make sure you aren’t at fault. It even goes so far as becoming reflexive at the very concept of a lost round, or any negative outcome. It’s not uncommon for people to make mistakes while they’re alone, and then retroactively blame their teammates for not being there with a “WHERE WAS TEAM!?!?”
In general, it’s a huge problem in games like Dota or LoL. Toxicity borne from negative emotions is now part of the core gameplay experience in public matches, which leads to others doing the same. I myself can’t even boot Dota anymore because of the associated negativity, despite not actively not engaging with it myself.
TomSelleck@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
This is why online multiplayer is just dead to some people.
grandel@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
I have over 5000 hours in Dota and couldnt have said this any better!
sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
There are actually some competetive pvp games that build in more complex mechanics and scoring systems that reward players for doing differing support roles, and more meaningfully give players on a team ways of communicating and coordinating.
These games are not widely popular though, and they’re kind of dying out… they’re usually some kind of flavor of tactical shooter or war sim, or particularly well designed mmos.
I personally don’t know why someone would play a team vs team game that has no real way to actually coordinate and incentivize team work, that’s known for having a toxic community, oh wait yes I do, MTX and peer pressure and dark patterns are extremely effective.