Porn be gore
favrion@lemm.ee 2 years ago
Not Safe for Work versus Not Safe for Life?
Whisper06@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 years ago
Socsa@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
Not safe for lemmy
zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 2 years ago
Not safe for looking. Gore, usually.
Subverb@lemmy.world 2 years ago
I’ve never once heard it called “Not Safe for Looking”.
Thats like a few years ago when my wife said she thought LOL was “Lots of Love”.
Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 2 years ago
I could swear back in the 00s it started as Not Safe for Landing but I couldn’t find anything to back that up when I checked
Subverb@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Interesting. I’ve never heard that one either, but perhaps. These things evolve.
Arfman@aussie.zone 2 years ago
Just provide the alt tag
favrion@lemm.ee 2 years ago
Al Gore?
Bebo@literature.cafe 2 years ago
Lol even I thought it’s not safe for life and was wondering what’s that about
Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Life is correct, NSFW is just something risqué or something that has bad language that you shouldn’t look at at work, but NSFL is like gore or something disgusting or terrible that you shouldn’t look at EVER unless you’re desensitized lol
Comment105@lemm.ee 2 years ago
NSFL can fuck with your head and might come back to haunt you.
Bebo@literature.cafe 2 years ago
OK thanks for the explanation. Now the difference between both makes sense to me.
gavi@lemmynsfw.com 2 years ago
I think content warnings would be a better approach to this, all other fediverse software have content warnings anyway. Making community content to force use content warnings would be helpful too.
dth@lemmy.world 2 years ago
i agree, use of cw would be more useful because ’nsfw’ is just too vague and not specific enough.