Comment on What Refutes Science...

will_a113@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• Mr_Fish@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  As long as they’re shorts, only showing one vague, unverifiable, third or fourth hand anecdote each.

  source

  • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    That makes sense. I heard that my college roommate’s pen pal said something like that.

    source
• Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody, because if not, you can miss with that.

  source

  • will_a113@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody

    Is there any other kind?

    source
• Slovene@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Maybe, if they’re from potholer54

  source

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    All hail potholer54! The guy is awesome

    source