Are you one of the idiots claiming sheep are sexually attacked during wool cutting?
Comment on Don't forget where we came from and what shaped us as a species. The Jungle.
AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 14 hours agoHave you seen how wool is actually collected? It’s quite violent.
FelixCress@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 13 hours ago
I could be wrong, but it sounds to me like you’re conflating things. Sheep, in their entire life cycles, are harmed and violated in a variety of ways. Considering they are forcibly bred, that aspect of their exploitation is arguably sexual assault.
FelixCress@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Yes, yes, and what is your doctor saying about that?
Cypher@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Yes, in a sheering shed and not on youtube.
It is not violent when done correctly, and the best shearers in the industry who can smoothly and quickly sheer a sheep without injury are highly sought after.
AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 7 hours ago
Are these best shearers not still commoditizing the products of the body of another thinking being?
How do we know your claims of non-violent sheering are true?
Where is the sheep in this shed, now?
Do they still have their horns?
Do they still have their tail?
How much of the industry do these sought-after shearers even represent?
www.surgeactivism.org/…/why-wool-not-vegan>>>
Cypher@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
What does that have to do with the question of whether or not the process of shearing is violent?
How do you know PETAs claims are true? (“As reported by PETA, one eyewitness to the process said”)
I’ve been an eyewitness to the process, and I’m not idealogically biased the way PETA extremists are known to be.
What? This sentence just doesn’t make sense. The sheep don’t live in the shed.
The females of the breeds I have observed don’t have horns, and their tails are docked to prevent excrutiatingly painful death by flystrike.
The alternative to wool production in Australia is cotton, which is even more environmentally destructive than sheep are, mostly due to the sheer amount of water required for cotton production. People need clothes so these industries aren’t going away.
Shearers have an interest in not causing unecessary harm to sheep, because it is counter productive. That’s my experience.
The rest of your argument is moralising which I am uninterested in.