Ah, still this wouldnât really apply because the workers/ people donât own this mode of production because, so they canât give it up.
The people you are thinking of are the ~400 individuals who own the means of product, and you are correct that they wonât willingly give that up.
nifty@lemmy.world â¨6⊠â¨days⊠ago
Dude you read what I wrote wrong, or you didnât get the context, itâs okay to say that instead of whatever verbal gymnastics youâre saying now. Grow up lol
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca â¨6⊠â¨days⊠ago
Just take the L, dude.
You clearly donât know what youâre talking about. Itâs like reading some garbage from chatGPT.
meep_launcher@lemm.ee â¨6⊠â¨days⊠ago
Well that wasnât very Mr. Rogers of you, please be kind here.
nifty@lemmy.world â¨6⊠â¨days⊠ago
It seems a little unnecessary to spin words to be correct, you can just say you read it wrong or donât respond đ¤ˇââď¸
Besides that, itâs okay. I know my anti-Marxist pov will always attract downvotes. I want to challenge the premise that a Marxist world is socially just or morally or ethically superior. I donât want to troll or cause grief.
0ops@lemm.ee â¨5⊠â¨days⊠ago
Marxist, anti-marxist, Iâm here still trying to piece together what the hell youâre trying to say
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca â¨6⊠â¨days⊠ago
Most of your downvotes arenât coming from being antimarxist but from blatant misuse of terms to try to scare people.
To take a note from your pages: itâs ok to just admit that you donât understand what private ownership is, or what communism is, and it seems pretty unnecessary to spew such verbal diarrhea in order to try to scare people into whatever it is youâre trying to scare them into