Comment on POV: It's January 19th
SoupBrick@yiffit.net 1 week ago
This article from 2024 gives a pretty good rundown as to why using this reasoning to ban Tiktok will set a very bad precedent:
npr.org/…/tiktok-ban-first-amendment-lawsuit-free…
If the govt cared about your data privacy, they would create data collection regulations that they could then use to ban tiktok if/when they violate them.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 week ago
They did. They banned sending US Citizen data to adversarial nations including China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and/or Venezuela. It was all packaged into one vote and now that’s the law.
SoupBrick@yiffit.net 1 week ago
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Lmao
ByteDance publicly admitted they stored the user data in Beijing in 2023.
SoupBrick@yiffit.net 1 week ago
Please read the article.
Rinox@feddit.it 6 days ago
I’m pretty sure that the Chinese government has direct unfiltered access to byte dance Chinese servers, there’s no need to “attempt” to obtain data, they don’t need a judge or an injunction, they can just do it. It’s a different system from the American or European ones.
SoupBrick@yiffit.net 6 days ago
The big issue is the US trying to ban Tiktok explicity for “national security” without showing the public a shred of evidence. What do you call it when China blocks access to an American app because of “national security”?
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Americans simply cannot grasp the difference between Not Collecting Data To Begin With and China Bad
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 days ago
You say that as if China doesn’t use it’s own citizens data extensively for nefarious purposes.