The important thing to remember is that she's still a teacher. She's just not teaching children anymore, since it doesn't pay enough. This should be a wake up call to most people...
elephantium@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The headline is really misleading. She now works for Costco corporate doing marketing training.
This just in: Corporate jobs pay more than public school teaching jobs. Film at eleven!
Bonehead@kbin.social 1 year ago
BrainisfineIthink@lemmy.one 1 year ago
You are why downvotes should be more common on Lemmy. You’re grossly misrepresenting the article and story.
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Downvoting you, because you are mischaracterizing the article content.
The first half of it describes how she started there and the regular positions she had, before she moved up and into the teaching position she has at corporate office, which is similar to the teaching position she had before; both are of a teaching.
bob_wiley@lemmy.world 1 year ago
TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 1 year ago
School teachers often get physically and verbally abused by both parents and students, with the abusers getting little to no reprocussions. In a corporate environment that would get you fired or arrested.
quicksand@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Yes. But that’s not how salaries are determined. Based on that teachers and front-facing retail workers would be the highest paid jobs
Zorque@kbin.social 1 year ago
Just because its obvious doesn't mean its not also bullshit.
Education is the single most important thing affecting a societies longevity and well-being. If the people responsible for that education aren't able to support themselves, it erodes the very foundation of the country.
Whether or not it affects the bottom line of an investment firm may be an important metric to you but it doesn't necessarily mean what's best for everyone.
bob_wiley@lemmy.world 1 year ago
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And the first half of the article? When you keep describing again and again is the latter half.
The whole article is about somebody’s career profession change and advancement, not just change.
elephantium@lemmy.world 1 year ago
How TF am I mischaracterizing it? The teacher in this story got a pay bump by taking a marketing job with Costco corporate, not by working in the warehouse. The headline implies that she got a raise by working for her local Costco. That’s misleading.
SomeKindaName@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Well then in that case your reading comprehension is pretty bad.
At first, I made $18.50 an hour — a little less than what I earned as a teacher. I put in 40-hour workweeks, five days a week, and got a $1-per-hour raise when I hit 1,000 hours.
elephantium@lemmy.world 1 year ago
My reading comprehension is fine. Do you understand the difference between the headline and the article?
To recap, my critique is that the headline obscures the real story – that she got a raise by getting a corporate job. “Works at Costco” clearly implies working at a store, not corporate.
Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 year ago
So you agree the headline is a lie because she was not making 50% more by switching to work at Costco but by finding a job with vertical promotion possibilities and getting a corporate job using her degree which few would be able to follow in her footsteps cause their is limited positions.
She took a pay cut to work on her feet all day.
This is a recruiter article bragging about how much better it is to work for Costco and they try to make the pay cut seem like not a big deal when there is vastly different perks and benefits.