Flying_Penguin
@Flying_Penguin@lemmy.zip
- Comment on Valve compares its loot boxes to Labubus in lawsuit defense 4 days ago:
There has been a lot of posts about how people order a single SSD from amazon and end up with a whole box of SSDs. And if i go to amazon and order just a single SSD in hopes amazon screws up and sends me a full box instead, then i just gambled.
Should we go after amazon for encouraging gambling?
- Comment on Valve compares its loot boxes to Labubus in lawsuit defense 5 days ago:
I honestly am not sure this is only about addiction. Instead i think this is mostly about parents who dont monitor their childs activites and want aomeone to blame for their child spending thousands of dollars on a video game.
- Comment on Valve compares its loot boxes to Labubus in lawsuit defense 6 days ago:
I still believe that is too broad of a definition. I go back to carnaval games. Those are games of skill but they are made in away to reduce your chance of winning, so luck is still a major factor.
Meanwhile loot boxes are neother a game of chance or a game of skill. They are a purchase and you get what you get. What are those mystery box toys called that everyone was going crazy for last year? LuLu dolls or whatever. Those are loot boxes. Should we regulate them like we are trying with video game loot boxes?
- Comment on Valve compares its loot boxes to Labubus in lawsuit defense 6 days ago:
Sure Japan has a way to protect people in regards to the claw machine. But gacha games and gachapon are huge in japan. And those are more predatory than loot boxes. So we still need to draw the line and sort out what actually is and isnt gambling.
Look at carnaval games, a mobile gambling group that targwts children? If we have loot boxes be labeled as gambling who is to say that we wont label everything else as gambling.
Where is the line?
- Comment on Valve compares its loot boxes to Labubus in lawsuit defense 6 days ago:
Claw machines are gambling. Those coin machines that you get a sticker or a plastic spider out of is gambling. Kids having been gambling for decades. Hell even coin pushers is gambling.
I feel like we need to fully define gambling before any of this is settled. I believe anything where you give money for some kind of return but have a chance of recieving nothing back, then that is gambling. If you are guaranteed to get something for your money then thats not gambling. Thats just a purchase.
- Comment on W rizz skibidi 2 weeks ago:
They are enforcers and even that’s slowly fading away.
- Comment on W rizz skibidi 2 weeks ago:
I miss when goon was a hockey term.
- Comment on Britain has a long history of spying on Iran 2 weeks ago:
Yeah but did you know that up is not down in Australia?
- Comment on Did I discover a fake conspiracy theory? 3 weeks ago:
I dont know anything about this story you mention. What i do know, is that people should understand the risks when they decide to take action. Denying them that knowledge is irresponsible, regardless of how rare those risks occur.
I help if im able and I am happy you do too. But the people that don’t help because they are scared of a potential risk of a lawsuit, I dont hold any ill will against them
- Comment on Did I discover a fake conspiracy theory? 3 weeks ago:
While good samaritan laws protect people who help others it doesn’t provide immunity. Intentional misconduct or gross negligence are a couple of ways a good samaritan can face legal action. Now, while those are good exceptions to have to protect the victim. Because of a broken/corrupt legal system those exceptions can be used against someone that was just trying to help.
Bottom line: Help others but dont be a hero or a creep. And you reduce your risk of facing charges.