kingofthezyx

@kingofthezyx@lemmy.zip

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Lies, all lies⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Yeah, they are models for a stock photographer - www.istockphoto.com/photos/antonio-guillem

  It’s pretty funny because all three of the models in the distracted boyfriend meme are used in a bunch of situations

  The walking girl is the girlfriend’s dentist

  The couple works together and the fallout is awkward

  The dentist tries to apologize to hlthe girlfriend, but girlfriend only pretends to forgive her

  Etc.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨kingdom come⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Yes, you’re correct but that’s why I said it was a “working” definition. When you’re a botanist (like many of my former professors) you still use the word vegetable in discussion. They would often teach us about local plants with indigenous uses using plain language like “the Chumash used the leaves of this plant as an important part of their vegetable intake”, rather than using some clinical term like “edible plant matter” or whatever.

  I was only saying in these contexts, they definitely wouldn’t describe fruits as vegetables because fruit are a specific thing to a botanist. They definitely wouldn’t describe fungi as vegetables because they are also a specific thing to a botanist (not relevant 😂)

  So in a scientific setting the word vegetable is still used, but it is mostly defined by what it’s not!

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨kingdom come⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Great post, with one caveat

  the closest thing to a definition we have for “vegetable” botanically is “literally all plant life and maybe also some fungi,”

  I got my degree in Ecology and Evolution, and we always used a similar working definition but it was “edible parts of a plant which are not fruit.”