Bravo
@Bravo@eviltoast.org
- Comment on "And my dick fucks your wife more than you do. What's your point?" 3 weeks ago:
Well I meant more along the lines of getting fired, but sure
- Comment on "And my dick fucks your wife more than you do. What's your point?" 4 weeks ago:
If he’s higher up than me and my job is at risk and I need the job, wouldn’t mouthing off be a bad idea?
- Comment on "And my dick fucks your wife more than you do. What's your point?" 4 weeks ago:
What’s my motivation? Is there a reason why I’m listening to Alec Baldwin brag about his watch? What’s stopping me from simply walking away?
- Comment on Let's play this game again 5 weeks ago:
Well it is, in the sense that rather than you becoming slightly better at things, everybody else becomes much worse, thereby you are still above average even though you have gotten worse.
- Comment on "You can't just have Geralt for every single game" says his voice actor, and if you think The Witcher 4 making Ciri the protagonist is "woke," then "read the damn books" 1 month ago:
Poe’s law is an adage of Internet culture which says that, without a clear indicator of the author’s intent, any parodic or sarcastic expression of extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of those views.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
Poe’s law is based on a comment written by Nathan Poe in 2005 on christianforums.com, an Internet forum on Christianity. The message was posted during a debate on creationism, where a previous poster had remarked to another user: “Good thing you included the winky. Otherwise people might think you are serious”.[4]
The reply by Nathan Poe read:[1]
Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won’t mistake for the genuine article.
The original statement of Poe’s law referred specifically to creationism, but it has since been generalized to apply to any kind of fundamentalism or extremism.[3]