Vincentmario
@Vincentmario@feddit.uk
- Comment on You okay babe? 2 weeks ago:
Hyphens clarify compounds, they don’t create them. Grammatically, ‘child eating’ modifies ‘pedophiles’, the head noun. Reading ‘child’ as its own noun would require ‘a child’ or a different construction, which isn’t what’s written.
- Comment on You okay babe? 2 weeks ago:
It says “stolen by child eating pedophiles”. The preposition “by” takes a noun phrase as its object.That noun phrase is “child eating pedophiles”. The head noun is clearly pedophiles. “child eating” is a modifier (a compound/participle phrase) describing those pedophiles
Hyphenation would make it clearer, but its absence doesn’t suddenly create a new valid reading where “child” becomes a separate noun or the main object
Gamer and yeah
- Comment on You okay babe? 2 weeks ago:
You’re interpreting a child being the subject of the statement. For this to be true, the original text would need to say ‘a child’. Only then would the sentence mean there’s a child going about eating paedophiles
- Comment on Confirms to Marxist theories regarding the proletariat. 4 weeks ago:
I tend to tip when they don’t call and just take the picture. I think I’m cancelling you out
- Comment on Moon talk 6 months ago:
Can I see the evidence? inb4 you deflect and refuse to cite anything
- Comment on Moon talk 6 months ago:
So the evidence doesn’t exist yet, but you’ve decided the conclusion anyway. That’s exactly the problem I’m pointing out. This is what MAGA does btw
- Comment on Moon talk 6 months ago:
I’m glad we agree capitalism has problems
- Comment on Moon talk 6 months ago:
At least you’re honest about pushing a narrative rather than engaging with evidence
- Comment on Moon talk 6 months ago:
The civil war has a clearly dominant causal factor that historians overwhelmingly agree upon. Modern socio economic issues don’t have that same level of single cause consensus. That’s why boiling everything down to ‘capitalism’ is overly reductive
- Comment on Moon talk 6 months ago:
It feels really gaslighting/dismissive to read things like this. Why is it that people who talk about concepts like capitalism assume a bunch of information about you based on a complete lack of information? Is the idea the only reason I’m not anti capitalist must either be because a) I’m rich (extremely far from the truth), or b) I’m especially susceptible to propaganda? (Which would be weird… Otherwise why would I be using Lemmy in the first place when perhaps capitalism instead suggests I should be using Reddit).
My opinion: It kind of sucks to reduce people down like this lol. Am I insane for thinking this
- Comment on Moon talk 6 months ago:
It’s very convenient that the explanation for a complex series of problems is reducible to just ‘capitalism’. Isn’t it like saying WWI only started because of the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand?
- Comment on What a shocker! 8 months ago:
All I said was gg 5 times
- Comment on Dear Americans, be prepare to get screwed! 1 year ago:
Vincent