qaatloz
@qaatloz@feddit.nl
- Comment on She is making a GREAT point 1 week ago:
Not really…
On the biological level it is trying to stop millions of sperm-cells to sneak in or prevent one egg-cell from being available. In the numbers game it is less risky and more reliable to make the one cell unavailable then to try to prevent the millions from being viable. Even if you shut 99.99% of them down, you still have more risk than having 99.99% chance of preventing the one cell being available.
I’m afraid that however we want the world to be equal for man and women, the biology itself is unfair and needs a lot more time and research if you want to equalize that.
Or use the tie-off snipsnip solution. It is a bit more permanent, but is pretty reliable in preventing.
- Comment on Duke University lost NIH grants because they used the prefix "trans" in reference to disease transmission, transgenic genetic material, translational studies and signal transduction 4 months ago:
Time to complain on truth social to Donald.
Why is my deal proposal not answered which was send in a mail with subject: “Transactional relationship improvement by affirmation of 100 million dollars to the expression program of the Trump foundation” - Comment on It's where you put the shit posts 5 months ago:
I think teams belong in 2024, in 2025 the icon of copilot should belong here. Its being shoved down your throat if you like it or not.
- Comment on You know... they have a point 6 months ago:
So its digging up dead children?🤔