Investor Who Pushed for Harvard President’s Exit Sees His Wife Accused of Plagiarism
Submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
Submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Why was an investor pushing for anything regarding academia? Who listened and why did they act on it? So much of this doesn’t make sense.
silence7@slrpnk.net 11 months ago
He’s a right-wing ideologue who saw a chance to break what he saw as left-leaning parts of academia.
hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
Sounds about right
CaptObvious@literature.cafe 11 months ago
Because he thinks his money buys influence and he was pissy when it didn’t initially. He’s also a racist who went after a Black woman because he could.
For the record, Business Insider isn’t reporting on his wife because she’s his wife. They’re reporting on his wife because she’s at least as much a plagiarist as Dr Gay.
Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Even so, her alleged plagiarism seems like a weak case; playing devils advocate and assuming an internal review had no teeth and a soft touch…
They had to go back to 1997. Not in publications or continuing work since, not a consistent effort to cheat in numerous cases - three passages in a lengthy PhD dissertation. Worthy of attention and explanation, absolutely. But Harvard didn’t feel it merited demotion, condemnation or resignation, even when they were under Congressional scrutiny.
Nahodyashka@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Because universities are businesses with shareholders?
Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
No. They aren’t… Not at all.
Gestrid@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
They don’t. Not typically, anyway. A private university may have a list of donors and a Board of Trustees, but the two aren’t related.