Players voted for some of the worst choices possible in the Steam Awards

Comments

• moody@lemmings.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Or… the votes didn’t matter and they put up whichever game they wanted as a winner.

  source
• CrushKillDestroySwag@hexbear.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Starfield for “Most Innovative Gameplay”

  data-laughing

  source
• CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  People vote for the game they recognise a good deal of the time.

  source
• AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Has there been some organised brigading from some kind of high profile source maybe? Someone promoting “joke” votes?

  source

  • rosahaj@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Steam does this themselves by incentivizing votes with badges and profile exp, the latter of which is needed to increase your maximum amount of Steam friends. People vote for the rewards, and as such, so many people vote that you end up “rewarding the good games that everyone played rather than the masterpieces played by only a few.” like the article said.

    source
• Donjuanme@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Comment seemed to disappear the first time, maybe it was too political. Focused efforts of people to cast doubt on legitimate good games. And people just wanting to break things.

  source