Growlers specialize in detecting, locating and destroying air defenses, they are a sophisticated intelligence node strapped to a rocket, there are no other similar global equivalents.
I’m sure this one will actually involve said equipment that was bought arriving.
Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 1 week ago
Great another ‘exquisite’ platform for us to do only what the US allows/demands us do with it, while we pay through the nose some US company for repair (the parts, hopefully we’ll do the repairs).
Excuse me while i highlight our supplicant State status as I point to 2000 US troops in Darwin an intelligence base in NT, a Submarine base in Perth, et al.
Oh and lets not forget our wealthiest idiot wants to give the Israelis a bunch more of our land and treasure to come and park their genocidal arses in Far North Qld for… reasons?..
With the events of the past two years a commitment to the US, and from the US, like this must be seen as a form of likely entrapment by a hostile major power, not an increase in the trust and capabilities of the alliance.
This is either a foolish decision by a naive and uncritical defense and political leadership, or we are in deep trouble with our largest so called ally and are already paying a form of tribute.
This is not a wise investment. This ties us closer to US hegemony over Australia’s sovereignty in a world where we should be crab walking away from such dependence on an unreliable and manipulative partner.
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
Sure don’t buy the F35 and kick the US out, but the way I see it Growlers are too dominant for only the US to possess, this is a move towards multipolarity.
Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 1 week ago
I didn’t read the article before commenting. I now have. Based on this comment I think you might’ve missed it in the article as well. Anyway whatever our miscommunication, its announcing a training and support package, no new aircraft are being purchased. So this fits with maintaining status quo and readiness. So from both our comments we probably agree on that.
But your response had a problem I want to highlight. You didn’t really demonstrate how its a move in the direction of multipolarity instead of my claim that its a move that can undermine Australia’s sovereign capability.
For me, what I’d be looking for to answer the caution around US technology sales to an ally would be something in the deal and it’s ongoing delivery that shows meaningful independent decision making and agency in use and destruction by the purchasing nation. Nothing in your comment really addressed that.
As I say it doesn’t matter now, but for the wider discussions around US hegemony of the Allied US/NATO alliance structure it does.
The below is where I’m at, when it comes to trust in the alliance. Its more of restatement, in a different way, of my first comment though.
Further sales of these aircraft are from a Nation that has demonstrated it’s willingness to simply consider invasion (Greenland) of an allies’ territory. This lowering trust joins a rising caution that its very hard for a purchasing nation to eliminate the possibility of kill switches being installed, either before or after purchase, for exquisite platforms. These combined should do lasting damage to the prospects of having a trustworthy alliance partner in the US. If they’re not raising alarm bells in defense, politics, and the country in general I question whether we really understand the predicament these developments place us in.