[deleted]
How is it legal for a webpage who get money by clicks life the photo's of alleged lawbreakers and put it on their site without pay the person in the picture anything? Is this also no jury biasing?
Submitted 1 day ago by Patnou@lemmy.world to [deleted]
Comments
jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 1 day ago
11111one11111@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Dont shit on people for your lack of reading comprehension and inability to understand english isnt every person in the world’s first language. Human brain can read sentences with missing letters from words. This is completely understandable.
What I don’t understand is, how you got so many votes for wanting to remove people who may not speak english well enough for your ignorant standards.
I dont recommend you and your asshole comments get banned but I will use the completely practical feature called blocking users.
Just to be a nice guy and save you the trouble, here is the link for career opportunities available for the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. They share the same disdain for humans that dont meet their arbitrary dumb as fuck standards. Just like you!
Patnou@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Then don’t stop and comment. Your comment is not relevant to the question and your trying to pick a fight
Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
In a lot of states, these kind of things are public record. The sites copy public information to their page.
Patnou@lemmy.world 1 day ago
So the picture is up for free for anything to do what they want to it and spread it massively around ??
slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You are likely leaning into extortion territory or defamation depending on the info surrounding the image.
Jury biasing is tricky as it requires the defense to know the person looked at it and is basing decisions on information outside the evidence of the case. As the juror would have made a proclamation of some kind that they have not researched the case in any way.
urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
What?