In Brazil, all capitals have vet programs with free sterilization.
Is pet care a privilage that only "rich countries" have? Do you think people from poorer countries should be judged for not taking their pets to a vet?
Submitted 1 day ago by DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works to [deleted]
Comments
driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 day ago
SolidShake@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No one should be judged for anything anywhere when it comes to money
kn33@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Maybe, but as far as things the rich countries have that poor countries don’t - pet care is pretty low on the list of things to rectify imo
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
I asked because my parents are like “pets that get sick should just get tossed into the trash so they don’t infect us” lol
searabbit@piefed.social 1 day ago
I think people who grow up middle class in a first world country are so sheltered from suffering that animal cruelty is the first example of it that they can actually empathize with and understand as a black and white issue (to them). Unfortunately, suffering is just a fact of life for everyone but the most privileged. The logical conclusion to “if you can’t give animals the standard of care that I expect as a global top 1%er of wealth, then you shouldn’t own any pets” is a PETA type policy of killing any pet that is living a suboptimal existence. Which, if they were humans, we would consider that genocide. It’s really just not a reasonable stance at all.
Witchfire@lemmy.world 1 day ago
All we can do is provide the best care we can and give them the best life we can provide