How about China agents? They already have russia ones...
Pentagon Bans Tech Vendors From Using China-Based Personnel After ProPublica Investigation
Submitted 2 days ago by remington@beehaw.org to technology@beehaw.org
https://www.propublica.org/article/pentagon-dod-microsoft-digital-escorts-china-ban-cybersecurity
lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 days ago
If I were in charge of the defence department of a government, there’s no way I’d ever allow closed source software to even touch machines with sensitive data. Or even pre-compiled software. Because the problem is not what you see, like personnel; it’s what you don’t, like bribery and backdoors.
TehPers@beehaw.org 2 days ago
Bribery and backdoors? Which government are we talking about here? Those are features.
lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 days ago
It’s a feature when you use it, but a bug when your competitors do it.
mp3@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Cloud computing I agree, at least until we figure out homomorphic encryption.
For cloud storage it’s not as bad, as long as you control the keys and the provider doesn’t see them then you can be fairly confident the data is safe.
lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 days ago
Even then, for cloud storage; cryptography is an additional layer of protection, but all this data should be kept offline as much as reasonably possible.