Google avoids break-up but must share data with rivals

Comments

• vermaterc@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  … and must share search data with rivals.

  What does it mean exactly?

  source

  • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It means the “Justice Department won against Google today” is a bullshit complicit victory that clears google from ever being attacked on monopolistic grounds again by double jeopardy because the justice department is run by incompetent fools

    source
  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Nothing. I expect a lawsuit at some point that complains that nothing useful is being shared.

    source
  • Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Hers the recipe for ice cubes. There, we shared our data.

    source
• xylol@leminal.space ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  So could I claim to be a rival and get data shared to me

  source

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    No, just corporation with the pockets to take them to court,
    It’s about the giants dividing the pie between them, not with you
    You don’t get pie, you’re diner

    source
• beebanoo@beehaw.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Well, tbh, it would be nice for it to stay compact and sink all together. Browser, ads, search engine, all of it.

  source

  • verstra@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    What would you say is the benefit to the consumer of common ownership here?

    source

    • beebanoo@beehaw.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Oh, that is a tough question. I think it depends on the consumer - for people like me, who value privacy above other stuff, this is not great news. But there are people in this world that find value in the integrated system Google provide.

      Anyway, my comment was more of a joke than a actual opinion on the matter.

      source