I wonder what moral philosophy could justify imprisoning someone for refusing to work under the terms of their agreement. I suppose it’s the same premise used to justify slavery.
In my view, you can have expectations about people and the nature of work in my business, and I can have expectations about what and how I’m compensated, my rights, and my roles if I work for your business. If we don’t meet each other’s expectations, we go our separate ways. In no way, should either of us, nor the state, imprison us if we refuse terms, unless a party breaks the law.
The real question, perhaps, is, “when and why is it against the law to refuse to work?”
DOPdan@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I am so proud of this union for sticking with it. The government should have no say when it comes to collective bargaining.
Flight attendants have been doing unpaid work for far too long.