Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Why does the design of any application for Lemmy look many times better than the design of web instances?

⁨27⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Sticker@lemy.nl⁩ to ⁨[deleted]⁩

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • slazer2au@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    The code for Lemmy is done by programmers who generally are not good at UX

    Where as app development has UX design as a core component.

    source
    • Sticker@lemy.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Then it’s strange that the offical developers have no interaction with third party designers. It’s hard to believe that none of them offered their options.

      source
      • slazer2au@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I suspect to keep with the decentralized theme, they provide the back end and publish a standards spec, which then allows front end designers to set things up how they like.

        Remember that just because you are a programer doesn’t mean you do everything with that program. This is one of those front end back end things where specialised people in back end can do what the like and leave the front end to people who like front end stuff.

        source
      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Eli5 answer:

        Typically, when devs build a product, a common method is to gather backend devs, frontend devs, ux designers, devops, project managers, etc. Everyone does their part.

        In open-source, you don’t have that. It’s whoever is willing.

        In typical development, backend devs work on something and get feedback from frontend devs, who get feedback from ux designers, all up the chain.

        In open-source, backend devs try to create interfaces that anybody can tap into. They think about all the use cases, and create ways for someone else (ux and frontend) to tap into. Thats also separation of concerns, as backend handles business logic and frontend handles user interaction.

        If a backend dev does a good job, then the flexibility allows the User interface to shine. That’s what we’re seeing here.

        source
  • ominouslemon@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    honestly, the web interface is great. Simple, clean and with everything you need

    source
  • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    phtn.app looks good to me

    source
    • Sticker@lemy.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It looks good. I wonder why the official developers won’t take this design for themselves?

      source
      • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Their view is probably that they have enough on their plates at the moment with the backend.

        Alternative frontends can be managed by independent projects, such as this one

        source
      • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        They don’t need to. The frontend they have is perfectly function, just not particularly pretty.

        source