Federal judge sides with Meta in lawsuit over training AI models on copyrighted books

Comments

• Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  There’s so much that’s going to need done once this era has passed, I’m hoping the EU steps up while the Americans just wallow in the shit

  source
• Ilixtze@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Americas kissing corporate ass, what else is new?

  source
• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Turning books into a language model is transformative. No LLM is a substitute for the original works.

  source

  • p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Yep. As much as everybody wants to shit on Zuckerberg, you can’t recreate exact copies with LLMs of any sort. You can’t claim that a 12GB image creation model somehow houses the entirety of all human-generated images.

    source

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Really, the whole basis for the anti-AI arguments seem to boil down to “It feels wrong that a billionaire’s corporation should be able to take the work of artists and writers and, without paying them for it, use it to create a tool that is then used to put them out of work.” And that’s absolutely 100% true, but it unfortunately doesn’t hold any legal weight, and the terms we currently have to describe intellectual property theft simply aren’t sufficient to describe what’s going on here. Until new laws are passed, I don’t see any of these attempts to stop AI going anywhere, but I’d love to be proven incorrect.

      source