Submitted 2 days ago by mez@lemmy.world to [deleted]
I can’t see any situation in which I would.
Mostly I have zero interest in sucking any dick (other than maybe my own, and I’m not that flexible).
But beyond that, $20 just seems wrong no matter what - if I wanted to do it, $20 would be pointless and if I didn’t, it wouldn’t be near enough.
I prefer sucking dick for free. When guys pay, they get a bit entitled about it and it’s less fun (can’t take a TMJ break).
I wouldn’t.
I would suck dick for free.
Depends on the guy. Also, whatever.
I would not suck dick for 100.000$
$20? No. $200? Still no. $2,000. Nopers.
But $100,000 USD? Yeah. That’s dick-sucking money. Now, if it came with caveats - swallowing, whatever - probably no. But for $1,000,000, I’d swallow.
It’s, like, eating human shit. Assuming it’s been sanitized and I’m not going to get some illness from it, for $1M, I’d do it. There isn’t a lot that’s not life-threatening I wouldn’t do for a million dollars, especially if it’s under a half-hour’s work.
$1M would dramatically reduce my retirement age.
But $20? There’s not a lot I would do that I normally wouldn’t for $20.
20? Nah
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Just 3 hours ago you complained Lemmy has too much liberal content, and here you are talking about prostitution. Prostitution is not liberal, but it’s something many conservatives won’t talk about.
lemmy.world/post/27631944
Maybe it’s time to step away and take a nap.
sxan@midwest.social 2 days ago
Legalized prostitution is liberal, though. Worker’s rights, protection, medical care… in every country with legalized prostitution, prostitutes have a better deal.
Note that I’m not saying that legalized prostitution is always good - human trafficking is still an issue. I’m just saying it’s a better environment than places where prostitution is illegal.
There may be liberals who see prostitution as exploitation, but more broadly, legalized prostitution is more supported by liberals.