No thanks. 20 year old movies don’t need sequels.
‘Gladiator 2’ Reviews Are In, And Better Than ‘Gladiator’
Submitted 5 weeks ago by Blaze@lemmy.cafe to movies@lemm.ee
Comments
Assman@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
BenFranklinsDick@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Its RT score is under Gladiator now.
Emperor@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
Still solid for what is an unnecessary sequel that could easily have fallen on it’s face (naming no names but Scott has form for that).
UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
It’s when articles say it’s “only” got 77% in reviews and act like that’s a terrible thing. Surely 50% would be a truly average film.