Rabbit Population

Comments

• shasta@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Yeah, “what” is right. Wtf is this?

  source

  • njaard@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    It’s making reference to logistic curves and how rabbit populations, which can grow exponentially, will oscillate between a low and high population size.

    In short, it explains why some years there are a shit ton of rabbits, and other years, very few.

    source

    • Eheran@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      But there is no oscillation visible here, just aliasing of the lines that make it appear as if there are suddenly none. Note the “none” instead of few. Also it would still not make sense since 1 can not split into 2? And why should the generational succession get faster and faster? 9 woman get 1 child every month kind of math or what?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Rubisco@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Veritasium - This equation will change how you see the world (the logistic map)

  source
• TragicNotCute@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  It’s going well

  source
• thesporkeffect@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Is this indicating the triple point of a rabbit?

  source

  • turnipjs@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    more like the triple point of two rabbits

    source
• Binette@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  And the best part in this is that it all aligns with the Mandelbrot set, for some reason

  Image

  Image

  source

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Life is just fractals tbh

    source

    • shneancy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      funny how you can come to the same conclusions if you’re - a) doing science b) doing Buddhism c) doing drugs

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • bsolos@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    It doesn’t, the one that aligns is the bifurcation diagram of the Mandelbrot function (the one used to make the set, f(z)=z^2+c), which is different from the rabbit one (the logistic map, f(x)=rx(1-x)).

    source

    • Collatz_problem@hexbear.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      They easily map to each other via linear transformation.

      source
    • Binette@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      Oh I never knew that!

      source
  • match@pawb.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    that’s meaningless because every bifurcation map looks the same

    source
• SwordInStone@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Image

  source
• Thorry84@feddit.nl ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  As so often with anything related to maths, pi pops out at the most unexpected places.

  source

  • criitz@reddthat.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    If you look hard enough, everything has a circle in it somewhere

    source
  • Chuymatt@beehaw.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Nah. 4.669

    source
• Hupf@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Yes.

  source