my boss: "no you are in stem now"

Comments

• marcos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Nobody can convince me that’s a good format.

  The “battles [1][7][8][9][31][42][44][45][47][64][65][67][68][83][99]” format is superior and I’ll die on that hill!

  source

  • i_am_hiding@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    In other words, IEEE > Harvard

    source
  • lud@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yeah this is awful to read.

    source
• goosehorse@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I’m working my way through House of Leaves right now, and the real horror is the grad school flashbacks from trying to follow the footnotes.

  source

  • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Jonathan Strange and Mister Norrell by Susanna Clarke is pretty fantastic/terrible about that. The footnotes are often entire short stories and span many pages.

    source

    • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I think the footnotes enhanced my love of that book.

      And I alway think kindly of Pterry’s nested footnotes.

      source
• tacosanonymous@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Could they not do the lil numbers with the footnotes instead?

  source

  • Khanzarate@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That is a footnote

    source

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Holy fucking shit.

      source
    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      They’re usually end notes.

      source
• Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  And still footnotes >>>>>>> […] >>> endnotes.

  source
• DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s even worse when you’re quoting some motherfucker that took PRIDE in plagiarism. Did Thomas More source his claims? No. He just made them and dared your peasant ass to say something about it.

  source